An Iam’s observation of particular interest is the following:
“Contrary to common belief, population-based
studies,[34-36] have found that elective pregnancy
terminations in the first and second trimesters are
associated with a very small but apparently real
increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous
preterm birth (PTB).[37]”
We applaud his statement. Most high profile American writers won’t breathe such a thing. Allow us to mention 2 points in regard to his observation.
1. “contrary to common belief…..’ There are currently 114 studies in the literature all showing a statistically significant association between induced abortion and subsequent preterm birth. And just about none to the contrary. Why then would this association be “contrary to common belief??” Because the association is systematically ignored or severely downplayed by the established authorities in our country. It is not mentioned under complications of induced abortion in any ACOG literature we know of. It is not generally taught. It is denied by default. Maybe that is why it is “contrary to common belief……” Obviously 114 articles should carry some weight, even to the willfully blind.
FULL STORY
